Quick answer
Direct answer
Risk scores
| CVSS metric | What it means |
|---|---|
| Attack vector (AV:N) | Network: reachable remotely |
| Attack complexity (AC:L) | Low complexity |
| Privileges required (PR:H) | High privileges required |
| User interaction (UI:N) | No user interaction |
| Scope (S:C) | Scope changed: impact spreads beyond the component |
| Confidentiality (C:H) | High confidentiality impact |
| Integrity (I:H) | High integrity impact |
| Availability (A:H) | High availability impact |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
About Glpi-Project Glpi
CVE-2026-26026 affects Glpi-Project Glpi, a product from Glpi-Project. Before acting, confirm where Glpi-Project Glpi runs in your estate, who owns it and whether it is reachable from the internet, because exposure decides real risk more than the score alone.
What the flaw is
In plain terms: GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0 to before 11.0.6, template injection by an administrator lead to RCE. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.0.6.
The weakness class is Code Injection. Attacker input is executed as program code.
Based on its CVSS vector, the flaw can be reached over the network, needs some level of access, and needs no user interaction. Apply the vendor fix and confirm exposure on internet facing and business critical assets first.
Affected versions and timeline
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Product | Glpi-Project Glpi |
| Affected versions | Glpi from 11.0.0 before 11.0.6 |
| Published | Apr 6, 2026 |
| Last modified | Jun 17, 2026 |
| Added to CISA KEV | Not listed |
| Assigning CNA | security-advisories@github.com |
How to detect it
- Inventory every instance of Glpi-Project Glpi and record the running version against the affected range above.
- Check external attack surface scans for internet facing instances of the component.
- Review logs on affected systems for unusual requests, errors or new processes around the vulnerable function.
- Confirm with an authenticated vulnerability scan once your scanner has a check for this CVE.
How to fix it
- Apply the fixed version of Glpi-Project Glpi named in the vendor advisory.
- If patching must wait, restrict network access to the affected service and put it behind authentication or a web application firewall rule.
- Rescan after the change to prove the exposure is gone, then close the ticket.
CTEM action plan
| CTEM stage | What to do for this CVE |
|---|---|
| Scope | Add every business service that depends on Glpi-Project Glpi to the current CTEM cycle. |
| Discover | Find all instances, including shadow and cloud deployments, and record versions and exposure. |
| Prioritize | Rank using EPSS and CVSS together with asset exposure and business impact. |
| Validate | Confirm the flaw is reachable and exploitable in your environment and that compensating controls work. |
| Mobilize | Assign the fix to the asset owner with a due date matched to the priority, then verify closure. |
CWE References
- CWE-94: Code Injection More CVEs with this weakness
- CWE-1336 More CVEs with this weakness
Technical References
Frequently asked questions
Related CVEs
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 10.0.0 to before 10.0.24 and 11.0.6, an authenticated user can perform a SQL injection via the logs export feature. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.24 and 11.0.6.
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0 to before 11.0.6, an unauthenticated time-based blind SQL injection exists in GLPI's Search engine. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.0.6.
The GLPI Inventory Plugin handles network discovery, inventory, software deployment, and data collection for GLPI agents. Prior to 1.6.6, non sanitized user input can lend to an SQL injection from reports, with adequate rights. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.6.
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0, < 11.0.3, an unauthenticated user can perform a SQL injection through the inventory endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.0.3.
Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 allows unauthenticated remote code execution via the service listening on TCP port 9002. A crafted request to the /test endpoint can cause the device to download, extract, and execute attacker-controlled files with root privileges.
Erugo is a self-hosted file-sharing platform. In versions up to and including 0.2.14, an authenticated low-privileged user can upload arbitrary files to any specified location due to insufficient validation of user‑supplied paths when creating shares. By specifying a writable path within the public web root, an attacker can upload and execute arbitrary code on the server, resulting in remote code execution (RCE). This vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to fully compromise the affected Erugo instance. Version 0.2.15 fixes the issue.
Earn your free CTEM certification.
Learn to scope, prioritize, validate and mobilize fixes for CVEs like CVE-2026-26026 with a free CTEM certification.
Beginner / Practitioner / Program Leader
Explore certifications